Howard Wolfson: The Three Diamond Man

News is that the Clinton campaign is in debt: it owes $8.7 million to vendors, not counting the $5 million it owes to Hillary clinton herself. Even after raising a record 35 million dollars in February(eclipsed only by Obama's $55 million).  Much of it (about half)  in small donations. One imagines many hardworking older women who identify with Hillary Clinton's struggles digging deep into their personal savings to contribute to her struggling campaign. It is not all fatcats that are supporting the Clinton campaign.

So where is the money going? Some of it  is the usual stuff of political campaigns: TV ads, Radio, dough nuts for the volunteers etc. But the Clinton campaign stands out in the remarkable fees charged by her campaign's star staffers. Especially remarkable considering their  sheer incompetence in planning and presenting her candidacy.

Mark Penn,  the John Goodman look alike who styles himself the Clintons' chief strategist got $2.7 million. It is natural that he will charge such hefty sums, being the CEO of a white shoe lobbying firm in DC. His partner Charlie Black charged less to McCain, but at least helped secure the Republican nomination.  Mark Penn is universally loathed, even within the Clinton campaign. This is the  guy  who periodically emerges to announce that some state or politician is not significant. Most recently, Bill Richardson. If he can't do a fair job for his own image what good is he doing for Hillary Clinton?

A less loathed, but no more effective,   figure in the Clinton Campaign is Howard Wolfson. He is paid $237,000 per month . For most of us that amount is hard to fathom.  That is about $1350 per hour, assuming a normal work week. (He  probably works long hours. )

To understand this figure let us compare it to the rate of the hookers of the agency that Elliott Spitzer hired. That is just about the only other occupation that would earn this much,  with this little to show for it. If Wolfson were a high priced hooker his hourly rate would be at the low end, a three diamond whore.  Probably they don't work the steady hours that Wolfson does: their work, one assumes, is sporadic in nature. So it is doubtful if even the seven diamond whores make as much in a month as Wolfson.

So what, you say?  It was Spitzer's money  to spend on his hookers. And he probably got off for it. He is in  trouble because he used to be a sanctimonius prosecutor and because he tried to hide his transactions. Some people look guilty spending their own money.

But Hillary Clinton is not spending her own money. When her campaign puts out the frantic emails to send cash, it is not emphasizing that much of it goes to mouths for hire such as Wolfson. The information was dug up by some NYTimes reporter from FEC filings. Does the supporter sending in the money know that the people writing those desperate pleas are getting a good chunck of the money?

Doesn't every body do this? Does  Obama not  have paid consultants? Yes, but  this is a whole different level. The counterpart to Wolfson in the Obama campaign makes $12,000 a month. Not chump change,  but not no where near a diamond rating. The Obama campaign has $38.8 million in cash, and no debt. When you give money to the Obama campaign, you can be sure that it is being spent responsibly.

Why is this relevant? If Hillary Clinton cannot manage her own campaign cash, without reaching the edge of bankruptcy twice in two months, how does she plan  to manage the country's finances?

Hillary Clinton is very unlikely concede the race. She has to  be admired for her tenacity. But there is a chance that her mismanagement of the campaign money is what will force her to quit.


Poll
How would you rate Howard Wolfson's performance?
No Diamond
One Diamond
Two Diamond
Three Diamond
Priceless

Votes: 10
Results : Vote Link : Polls

Display:


Priceless (2.00 / 1)

With the likes of Wolfson around, I don't need to make up anything to be funny. The man is a Priceless gift to comedy.

Please vote Priceless above if you believe that.


by LibDem on Sat Mar 22, 2008 at 05:25:55 PM EST

Mark Penn (2.00 / 0)

Does he do all of Hillary's ads? I saw some article say that he was paid something like $3,000,000 in January and February.  


by highgrade on Sat Mar 22, 2008 at 05:35:23 PM EST

Re: Howard Wolfson: The Three Diamond Man (2.00 / 0)

Yes about $2.7 million.  I didn't pick on him because even his colleagues loathe him. Besides he is paid more than any whore even Spitzer would hire. Just off even that scale.

He claims credit for the 3am ad. Not sure if he checked if the girl in the commercial was for Obama.

Contribute to Hillary. She has so many lobbyists to feed.


by LibDem on Sat Mar 22, 2008 at 05:43:35 PM EST

Re: Howard Wolfson: The Three Diamond Man (none / 0)

I think it's a fair criticism to say that Hillary's campaign has not been managed well.  I think since her new manager came on board, things have improved.  They have also finally gotten a serious pollster, so Mark Penn no longer polls his own spin.

If you look at communications over the past two weeks, you can see a marked difference in tone and imagery.  So, they have started to adapt.  The question is whether it was too late.

No, Clinton supporters don't much care for Mark Penn.  He seems to say clumsy or unfortunate things most times he is allowed to interact with the public.  It is said that Hillary is very loyal and has been extremely reluctant to fire him because of that.

If you think about her handicaps: 1/2 Obama's money, a gaffe-machine like Penn, and a media that has done it's best to peddle Obama press releases as "news", it absolutely amazes me that she is about 50/50 with Barack at any given time.  But it shows that her support is much deeper than talking heads thought when they declared her "dead" after the potomac primary.


by bobbank on Sat Mar 22, 2008 at 05:52:41 PM EST

If she is any good at managing why hire Penn? (2.00 / 1)

Being a President is a job. It is not a title and not a reward for being supportive. It is primarily about hiring good people and firing the morons.

If Hillary Clinton cannot do that, what claim does she have on the Presidency? She has 1/2 Obama's money because she did not, and her staff did not,understand the power of the internet. She is still talking about `Xeroxing'. When is the last time you xeroxed something? Her time has come and gone.

Why did she not fire Penn? The guy is so pathetic I decided not to pile on to him, and picked on Wolfson instead.

Obama has a much better Press operation it is true. That is what campaign money is for: hire good PR people. Fire the morons.

She is not 50/50 with Obama. The delegate split is 53-47. That is a respectable lead in any election. With the arcane Dem party rules (written by Clinton flacks such as Ickes) it will take a 70-30 split in popular vote to overcome that. Just not possible.

How did the most famous Senator in the country, who seemed the inevitable nominee at first, end up struggling for her campaign's life at the end of March?

It is the incompetence of her staff. In the end, it her inability to manage.

Things could be worse.  The Republican Congressional Campaign Committee treasurer just disappeared with a million dollars. Really the whole Clinton operation is `Republican lite'. It reeks of cronyism and incompetence. The new manager is not any better; the new financial crisis is happening in her watch.

Not surprising, as the whole premise of Hillary's candidacy is nepotism. One does not have to Ferraro to see that the  only reason she is getting this chance is because is that she was married to President Clinton.

Obama-Richardson 2008 !


by LibDem on Sat Mar 22, 2008 at 06:07:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Howard Wolfson: The Three Diamond Man (none / 0)

Remember, Senator Clinton began with all the advantages. Universal name recognition, the legacy of a popular president, strong Latino support, very strong support in the upper South (OK, AR, KY, TH, WV), a large home state loaded with Wall Street donors, a huge superdelegate advantage, support from women (the majority of Dem voters), and even significant support from the black community (until South Carolina). The fact that she's still around? I guess that's something, after all the advantages she blew, most candidates would be over after a fiasco like that. She is certainly tenacious. But I wouldn't really call it impressive.


Visit Election Inspection for analysis, polls, and predictions!
by X Stryker on Sat Mar 22, 2008 at 08:34:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Sshhhhhhhh (none / 0)

Remember she si the underdog.


-- be excellent to each other
by kindthoughts on Sat Mar 22, 2008 at 08:51:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Sshhhhhhhh (none / 0)

Since when? She started with a twenty point in advantage in every state that she lost. The sheer incompetence of her campaign staff is enough reason to vote against her. Remember some of these guys will be running FEMA if Hillary wins.

Obama-Richardson 2008 !


by LibDem on Sun Mar 23, 2008 at 07:48:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.